Colon Cancer Today. Learn about the symptoms, detection and treatment of Colon Cancer.
A Member of the Healthscout Network
 Printer Friendly  Send to a Friend

U.S. Women's Health Care Still Falls Short: Report

11 states as well as District of Columbia receive failing grades

By Amanda Gardner
HealthDay Reporter

WEDNESDAY, Oct. 17 (HealthDay News) -- The United States isn't making the grade when it comes to women's health, a new report contends.

The report gives the country an overall grade of "unsatisfactory" because it meets only three of 27 benchmarks for women's health. Those benchmarks are the percentage of women aged 40 and over who get regular mammograms; the percentage of women who visit their dentist annually; and the percentage of women aged 50 and over who are screened for colorectal cancer.

Advertisement
Related Stories
 border=
Exercise Lowers Risk of Colon Cancer
Cannabis-Linked Cell Receptor Might Help Prevent Colon Cancer
Colon Cancer Screening Rates Remain Low
Related Videos
 border=
Colon Cancer Blood Test
High-Tech Training For Surgeons
Colonoscopy: Not Just For Colon Cancer
Related Slides
 border=
Colon Cancer
Related Encyclopedia
 border=
Colonic Irrigation
Colonoscopy
Colorectal Cancer


Not one state received an overall "satisfactory" grade in the area of women's health. Three states -- Massachusetts, Minnesota and Vermont -- received "satisfactory minus" grades, down from eight states in 2004.

Eleven states, as well as the District of Columbia, received failing grades -- Alabama, Arkansas, Indiana, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Oklahoma, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, West Virginia -- double the number that failed in 2004.

All other states received a rating of "unsatisfactory," according to the report, released Wednesday by the National Women's Law Center and Oregon Health and Science University.

"As the years pass, states are further behind in the quest to meet national goals for women's health," Judy Waxman, vice president for health and reproductive rights at the National Women's Law Center (NWLC), said during a teleconference. "States have made some progress in adopting policies that could advance women's health as opposed to past report cards, but we still have a long way to go because once policies are in place, it takes a while to make an impact on health status."

Dr. Suzanne Steinbaum, director of Women and Heart Disease at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City, said she was "absolutely appalled by this study. We're running around the U.S. talking about women and heart disease, and here we have in all states an increase in obesity, and 46 states got worse in diabetes. This should be on the mind of every single presidential candidate."

The report, Making the Grade for Women's Health: A National and State-by-State Report Card, is the fourth in a series of triennial report cards analyzing benchmarks of women's health in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The 27 benchmarks were based on goals set by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2010 agenda.

Obesity was the only indicator that worsened in every state since 2004.

"The implications for that are enormous," Dr. Michelle Berlin, associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Oregon Health and Science University, said at the teleconference. "Rates of diabetes and other cardiovascular diseases are on the rise across the U.S. and obesity is a clear link to that."

The report also looked at whether states have adopted 63 policies considered important for women's health. Only two policy goals were met by all states.

"Those were Medicaid coverage for breast and cervical cancer treatment and participation in the Food Stamp Nutrition and Education program," Waxman said.

Nine states met a majority (32 or more) of the policy goals, up from three in 2004. California, New York and Rhode Island were at the top of the list, while Idaho, North Dakota and South Dakota were at the bottom.

There was some progress in adopting policies for screenings for sickness. Twenty states (up from 17 in 2004) now require insurers to cover colorectal cancer screenings. And 11 states (up from eight in 2004) require coverage for osteoporosis screening. On the other hand, only 20 states (down from 21 in 2004) require insurers to cover annual mammograms for women over 40.

"There's been minimal progress on implementing some of these policies and, unfortunately, it is piecemeal and inconsistent," Waxman said.

The new report also spotlighted the issue of women's health insurance, and in this area the nation and states are still lacking.

No state met the goal for access to health insurance. Nationwide, 18 percent of women aged 18 to 64 were uninsured. In 2007, five states decreased Medicaid eligibility levels for working parents, making it more difficult for low-income people to get insurance.

The report also found great regional differences in the health status of women. Hawaii had the lowest percentage of obese women (16.7) percent, while Mississippi had the highest percentage (31.5 percent). Utah had the lowest number of women with high blood pressure (17.7 percent), while Mississippi, again, had the worst (34.4 percent). Minnesota had the lowest proportion of women with diabetes (4.3 percent), while West Virginia had the highest (11.1 percent) and Mississippi the second highest (10.6 percent).

"Health disparities are still an enormous problem in the U.S.," Berlin said. "We have made few gains in the time that we have had these report cards. There's not much time remaining before the year 2010 arrives."

More information

View the report at the National Women's Law Center.

SOURCES: Suzanne Steinbaum, D.O., director, Women and Heart Disease, Lenox Hill Hospital, New York City; Oct. 17, 2007, teleconference with Judy Waxman, vice president for health and reproductive rights, National Women's Law Center, Washington, D.C., and Michelle Berlin, M.D., associate professor of obstetrics and gynecology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland; Making the Grade for Women's Health: A National and State-by-State Report Card, Oct. 17, 2007

Copyright © 2007 ScoutNews, LLC. All rights reserved.
Last updated 10/17/2007



Disclaimer: The information provided on this website is for educational purposes only and does not serve as a replacement for care provided by your own personal health care team. This website does not render or provide medical advice, and no individual should make any medical decisions or change their health behavior based on information provided here. All pertinent content provided on this website should be discussed with your personal physician to evaluate whether it has any relevance to or impact on your specific condition. Reliance on any information provided by this website is solely at your own risk.


Aug 19, 2008
Home
Search
Powered By HealthLine
Patient Guide
News
Health Videos
Health Encyclopedia
Health News Archive
Affiliate Information
HealthScout Network
Contact Us
Newsletters
Privacy Policy
Terms of Use

We comply with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health
information:
verify here.
About The HealthScout Network Contact Us
Copyright © 2001. The HealthCentralNetwork, Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy  Terms of Service  

To find more information on specific conditions, please visit our partner sites: